Preparing for Martyn’s Law isn’t something that lends itself well to last-minute action. A more structured approach is likely to deliver better results.
A two-year timeframe gives organisations the opportunity to build things properly, rather than rushing to implement changes under pressure.
The first year should focus on understanding what’s required. That means looking at current processes, identifying potential risks, and starting to build awareness internally. Early engagement tends to make the later stages easier.
The second year is where that groundwork turns into action. Policies are formalised, procedures are tested, and any operational or physical changes are introduced where needed.
Procrastination is the real issue here. The longer preparation is delayed, the more difficult it becomes to implement changes in a considered way.
Not every organisation will need the same level of response, but all will need to demonstrate that they’ve taken a structured and proportionate approach.
Final thought:
A phased plan doesn’t just support compliance it reduces risk, avoids disruption, and gives organisations time to get it right.
This article was originally featured in FMJ:
